Register free! 
Competition Law - Judgement
[ 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 ]

 
First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 26   
Title Forum  Year
Cartelization in Tender No. 59 of 2014 of Pune Municipal Corporation for Solid Waste Processing of Lahs Green India (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re [LexDoc Id : 525502]
MISC 2018
Parsoli Motor Works (P) Ltd., In re vs BMW India Private Limited and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 525503]
MISC 2018
B. Himmatlal Agrawal vs Competition Commission of India and Ors. Dismissal of appeal-Right to file-Whether, Appellate Tribunal, thus, had no jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal itself. Held, right to file appeal and have said appeal decided on merits [LexDoc Id : 524923]
SC 2018
Masood Raza, In re. vs Uttar Pradesh Avas Avam Vikas Parishad (UPAVP) Unfair trade practices by opposite party-Sections 2(r) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Abuse of dominant position in relevant market-Whether, the OP has indulged in unfair and arbitrary practices and misused its dominant position in market in contravention of provisions of Section 4 [LexDoc Id : 524652]
MISC 2018
India Glycols Ltd., In re. vs Indian Sugar Mills Association and Ors. Abuse of dominant position-Sections 2(h) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Associated enterprise-Whether OP-1 has abused its dominant position in the market for supply of ethanol to the PSU OMCs in violation of the provisions of Section 4 of the A [LexDoc Id : 524650]
MISC 2018
Nagrik Chetna Manch, In re. vs Fortified Security Solutions and Ors. Cartelization and bid rigging-Sections 27 and 46 of the Competition Act, 2002. Imposition of penalty-Whether, the allegations of cartelisation and bid rigging and/or collusive bidding by OP-1, OP-2, OP-4, OP-5, OP-6 and OP-7 in the PMC's Tender pertai [LexDoc Id : 524367]
MISC 2018
Cartelisation in respect of zinc carbon dry cell batteries market in India, In re. vs Eveready Industries India Ltd., Indo National Ltd., Panasonic Energy India Co. Ltd. and Association of Indian Dry Cell Manufacturers [LexDoc Id : 524028]
MISC 2018
Competition Commission of India vs Thomas Cook India Ltd. and Ors. Imposition of Penalty-Nominal-Whether, imposition of penalty was justified. Held, imposition of penalty Under Section 43A is on account of breach of a civil obligation, and proceed [LexDoc Id : 523837]
SC 2018
SCM Solifert Ltd. and Ors. vs Competition Commission of India Imposition of Penalty-Breach of civil obligation-Whether imposition of penalty Under Section 43A is on account of breach of a civil obligation. Held, there was no requirement of mens rea Under Sectio [LexDoc Id : 523836]
SC 2018
Karnataka Power Corpn. Ltd. vs Coal India Ltd., Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Western Coalfields Ltd. Abuse of dominant position-Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Unfair trade practices-Whether, the Coal India Limited and its subsidiaries had abused its dominant position in contravention of Section 4 of the Act. Held, the relevant mar [LexDoc Id : 522656]
MISC 2018
Vishal Pande vs Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 522614]
MISC 2018
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. and Ors. vs Competition Commission of India and Ors. Review of order of Competition Commission-Section 26 of the Competition Act. Power of investigation-Petitioners challenged the order of the respondent No. 1 CCI under Section 26(1) on ground that same was not in accordance with the provisions of the [LexDoc Id : 522627]
HC (Delhi) 2018
Sarv Prakash Developers vs Phantom Films, Zee and Essel Group, Fox Star India [LexDoc Id : 522613]
MISC 2018
Express Industry Council of India vs Jet Airways India Ltd., IndiGo Airlines, SpiceJet Ltd., Air India Ltd., Go Airlines India Ltd. Cartelization by Airlines in fixing Fuel surcharge (FSC)-Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002. Anticompetitive agreements-Whether OPs have operated in concerted manner while fixing FSC and thereby violated the provisions of Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3) of the Act. [LexDoc Id : 522657]
MISC 2018
MRF Ltd. vs Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) and Ors. Cause of action-Delay-Whether, writ petition itself was filed after such long time. Held, no doubt, delay is sought to be explained by petitioner. In any event, this Court [LexDoc Id : 522260]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Satyendra Singh, In re and Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) [LexDoc Id : 522061]
MISC 2018
Ramachandran V., In re. and JSW Cements Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 522059]
MISC 2018
Prem Prakash, In re. and Airport Authority of India and Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 522062]
MISC 2018
Bharat Burman and Ors., In re, Harsh Vardhan, In re., Anuradha and Ors., In re, Man Mohan, In re., Harsh Vardhan and Ors., In re, Krishan Arora, In re., and Sangeeta Arora and Ors., In re. and Ram Housing Finance and Investment of India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 522056]
MISC 2018
Industries and Commerce Association, In re and Coal India Ltd., Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ministry of Coal [LexDoc Id : 522055]
MISC 2018
HPCL-Mittal Pipelines Limited ('HMPL'), In re. and Gujarat Energy Transmission Corpn. Ltd., State Load Dispatch Centre and Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. ('PGVCL') [LexDoc Id : 522057]
MISC 2018
Arun Mishra, In re and State of U.P. through Chief Secretary, Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman, UP Electricity Regulatory Commission, Sanjay Agarwala, Government of UP, AP Mishra, UP Power Corporation, KSK Power, Moserbaer Power, Navayuga, India Bulls Power, D [LexDoc Id : 522060]
MISC 2018
Asmi Metal Products (P) Ltd., In re. and SKF India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 522058]
MISC 2018
Competition Commission of India vs Fast Way Transmission (P) Ltd. and Ors. Abuse of dominant position-Denial of Market Access-Whether, there is an abuse of such dominant position Under Section 4(2)(c) where Respondent could be stated to have indulged in a practice resulting i [LexDoc Id : 521235]
SC 2018
Surinder Singh Barmi, In re. vs Board of Control for Cricket in India [LexDoc Id : 520922]
MISC 2018
 
First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last